Hey, hey, ho, ho, sen-a-tors have got to go!

Posted by on 05/20 at 07:49 AM

The Alabama Senate has one standing job. ONE JOB.

Yes, it’s charged with other things, like confirming Auburn University trustees. But there’s only ONE THING that it has to accomplish each and every year.

And the State Constitution gives senators 60 days each year to do it.

No, it’s not repealing the state’s sales tax on groceries—although you might think so for all the attention that issue has gotten over the last month.

No, it’s not reforming state campaign finance laws and the PAC-to-PAC transfers that make them a joke—although that issue has been around for so long that it would make sense that it would be an annual responsibility.

It’s passing the state’s budgets.

Among them is the budget that funds Alabama’s public education system from pre-K through university level. You know the education budget: That thing that makes it possible for Alabama’s teachers to be paid, for the lights in the schools to come on, for books and other educational materials, for reading programs and computers and science labs and athletics programs and everything else that comprises state schools.

Yesterday was the last day of the 2008 session.

Did they pass the education budget?

NOOOOOOOOOooooo!!!!!!

For that matter, did they pass the grocery tax repeal?

NOOOOOOOOO!!!

Well, certainly they passed that PAC-to-PAC bill, which everyone agreed during election season two years ago needed to pass. After all, they’ve had long enough to consider it, right???

NOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Nor did they pass many of the more than 170 other bills the House of Representatives, with its 105 members and different sets of opinions, managed to agree on and send to the 35-member Senate.

I can’t wait to see the talking points from the majority and minority offices. Let me guess—it will go something like this:

Republicans will say Democrats filibustered and refused to compromise to pass meaningful legislation for Alabamians. They’re at fault, the GOP will say.

Democrats will say Republicans filibustered and refused to compromise to pass meaningful legislation for Alabamians. They’re at fault, the Democrats will say.

But that’s not to say they won’t agree on some things.

They’ll rush to your community groups and club meetings, eager to remind you about all the pork they’ve managed to haul home in previous sessions and promise more from this summer’s special session. They’ll provide you a laundry list with all the good things their party did—or were precluded from doing because of the cowardly obstructionists on the other side—and all the bad things the other party did—or were kept from doing due only to the great courage and tenacity they displayed.

In short, it will be 30 to 45 minutes of the most self-aggrandizing, self-centered self-promotion that you’re likely to see anywhere (except when your congressman comes to town).

It will almost be enough to make you sick.

Almost.

And that’s why most all of these clowns will be back in 2010: Because Alabamians either have a short memory of wrongs they have suffered at the hands of those who govern them, or they’ve just been abused too much to notice anymore.

It’s just my opinion, of course, but I think that if there isn’t one among them with leadership ability enough to put a stop to all this madness in Montgomery, they all need to go. Let’s throw them all out, thoroughly fumigate the building and start all over.

Why not? What we’ll have then can’t be worse than what we have now.

More on what the failure of the education budget means for Alabama, and what’s coming next, in a little bit ...

... When my blood pressure drops.




“Factions blame each other for disappointing Alabama legislative session” in today’s Birmingham News contains this statement: “House members, frustrated with Senate inaction on the education budget and other bills, joked Tuesday morning that they desired legislation to change Alabama to a unicameral legislature, but that the bill probably would die in the Senate.”

I’d like to see them take such a suggestion seriously, and go one step further.

The following, which I wrote in 2003, is copied from a page (http://www.doctoriq.com/rx.htm)on my website:

Rightfully, it seems to me, the Alabama Legislature is held in low esteem by many citizens; but what can the citizens do about it? Some members of the legislature seem to stay there forever, because I can’t vote against anyone other than the two members who represent me, and the same goes for you. Of course, we tend to think that “our guys” are good guys and that the trouble is with those other 138 members. What can we do about them? Why not restructure the legislature in a way that would eliminate many current members and make it more difficult for others to stay in office indefinitely? Only because the legislature will not do that, and the citizens can’t, unless they first obtain the constitutional right to an effective Petition And Referendum process. THAT is the starting point toward better government for Alabama --- through a better state legislature.

If Alabamians obtain the right to a Petition and Referendum process, only one third of the battle for better government will have been won. The other two parts will be [1] getting a legislature re-structuring referendum on the ballot, then [2], getting it approved by the voters. Both steps are certain to be vigorously opposed—not by ordinary citizens who will stand to gain, but by those who will lose power. That includes the current legislators; political parties; Paul Hubbert , Mac McArther, David Bronner, and other “BIG MULES”; teachers, state employees and their unions; and lobbyists and their special interest employers who will lose much of their influence if our new legislature is designed to be non-partisan , as was done in Nebraska.

Alabama’s re-structuring of the legislature should go one step further than Nebraska’s in order to substantially reduce, if not eliminate entirely, the power of those dreaded “BIG MULES” who currently have a stranglehold on our legislature. As unorthodox as it may seem at first thought, the best way I can imagine to do that would be to make our new legislature a full time—that’s correct—a full time job. I know this really sounds like a crazy idea, so I will try to explain the advantages of doing just that.

To be as short as possible in saying why our new unicameral [only one body with far fewer members] legislature should be a full time job, I will just highlight what I envision as some of the advantages without too many details which might be apparent to you, anyway. [1] Foremost is that a full time legislature would require our current legislators who spend most of their time at their “day job”, such as in the field of education, law, or other special interest positions, to choose whether to stay in that line of work or to be legislators. Goodbye AEA, Paul Hubbert, “double dippers”, and others. [2] Members could give their total attention to legislation. [3] It would allow more time for legislators to deliberate thoughtfully, rather than in a frenzied rush. [4] Special sessions would be unnecessary. [5] Urgent situations could be handled without waiting for the start of a new session. [6] The numerous staff personnel would be kept busier full time by eliminating slack periods of months between sessions. [7] A much smaller body working full time with two two-week breaks and 10 holidays each year, if paid a reasonable salary, besides being more efficient and productive, would still be less costly than our current legislature. Still, the greatest improvement would be reducing or eliminating the power of those “BIG MULES”. Isn’t it time to close the barn door?

Posted by DonS  on  05/21  at  08:30 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:



Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles