Keith Olbermann (sorry)
Posted by Jennifer J. Foster on 08/19 at 03:27 PM
(0) Comments


(I apologize in advance for defiling this blog with Keith Olbermann-related content. But some things just have to be said.)

I stumbled across Keith Olbermann’s latest “special comment” today.

Trust me, it was accidental. As a matter of practice, I make it a point to avoid reading or listening to anything that is hyperpartisan, whether left or right. I don’t listen to Rush, I won’t watch Jon Stewart, I avoid Sean Hannity and—as you know from yesterday—I cannot stand Bill Maher.

So you can probably guess that I don’t catch much of Olbermann’s work.

But I have to admit that the headline of this article sucked me in: “Olbermann chastises McCain: Grow up! Senator is acting like a child, needs immediate attitude adjustment,” it read.

If you know anything about post-SportsCenter Keith Olbermann, who has become but a caricature of the popular TV personality he once was, you know I could just leave it right there.

First of all, regardless of one’s political disagreement with a candidate, it takes a special kind of arrogance for someone who’s never served in the Armed Forces—i.e., Olbermann—to take this sort of tone with someone who spent five and a half years being tortured in a POW camp.

But that Olbermann, he’s an overachiever. He’s turned his special brand of arrogance into twisted, grotesque art.

I thought about dissecting this “special comment,” as Olbermann so humbly calls his regular, vitriolic TV diatribe:

  • It’s bombastic;
  • It’s unnecessarily long winded;
  • It’s punctuated as if it was left out on the porch and pelted with a hailstorm of commas;
  • The number of rhetorical questions makes readers wonder whether they’ve accidentally stumbled on to some bad Aristotle impressions written by flunked-out philosophy students; and
  • It’s laced with a toxic, personal disdain for and derision of his subject that goes beyond Olbermann’s political disagreements.

    All these things typify Olbermann offerings, and they explain why he is among the least credible political commentators out there. But instead of wasting my time on anything Keith Olbermann has to say, I thought I’d just bottom-line it.

    McCain could respond with an eerily familiar refrain:

    “McCain chastises Olbermann: Shut up! Commentator is acting like a child, needs immediate attitude adjustment.”

    But I’m sure McCain’s people are just going to ignore Olbermann. And they should. Unless he’s talking about sports—which he never should have stopped doing, by the way—there’s nothing “special” about his comments, anyway.




  • New poll!
    Posted by Jennifer J. Foster on 08/19 at 06:18 AM
    (0) Comments


    Thanks to the technical wizardry of oanow.com site coordinator John Walker, we have a new poll this morning!

    Scroll down a bit and check out the poll between the calendar and the map. Of course, the subject is Barack Obama’s VP selection, the announcement of which now seems imminent.

    Want to bone up on the candidates? Before casting your vote, check out CNN’s veepstakes rundown, which gives the pros and cons of both parties’ VP prospects.

    So come on, readers: I know you’re out there! Get in the scrum! Let’s have some fun with this before reality ruins it for us. 




    28 hours to go?
    Posted by Jennifer J. Foster on 08/19 at 12:01 AM
    (2) Comments


    Drudge is all a-twitter about a report in the New York Times that Barack Obama has settled on his vice presidential choice and is readying his announcement, which could come within 30 or so hours of this posting.

    According to those omnipotent, omnipresent, always-anonymous advisers, Obama just made the decision during his Hawaiian vacation last week—which means, if that’s true, he knew who his VP choice will be when he was sitting with Rick Warren at that huge forum on Saturday night.

    The remarkable thing about this story is the story within the story: The Obama campaign is apparently going to great lengths—the NYT writers say the campaign is contriving an “elaborate rollout plan”—to properly stage the announcement.

    We already know it will commence with a text message to millions of Obama’s closest and dearest supporters ... along with a bunch of nosy journalist-types like me who signed up to get the message just so we can see what everyone else is getting.

    And from there, it’s all about the hype. The Obama campaign is using the press like a little toy to whip up enthusiasm and anticipation about the announcement—by talking about all the enthusiasm and anticipation about the announcement.

    That’s what we call circular reasoning, folks.

    Consider these comments from Obama’s anonymous advisers about the VP selection and announcement process:

  • Advisers hyped the secrecy of the announcement by enphasizing that the candidate’s deliberations were “remarkably closely held” and that “perhaps a half-dozen advisers were involved in the final discussions” as a way of enforcing the no-leak edict Obama issued to staff members. But the advisers did feel comfortable enough in this “cone of silence” (sorry; I couldn’t resist) to offer up three names as shortlisters—Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh, Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine of Virginia and Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden Jr.—just to fuel the speculation fire. In other words, big leak, bad; little leak, good!

  • According to these faceless advisers, Obama had notified neither his soon-to-be VP nor the almost-choices of their status as of late Monday. I don’t believe this. Either he’s notified the person, or he’s still deliberating. You don’t just drop in on someone and say, “Road triiiip!! Hop in; we’re going to travel the country for 10 weeks, and you might end up as the vice president of the United States when it’s all over!” The person has to have time to plan—especially if he (or she) is a governor (Kaine, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius). Keep in mind, if Obama had settled on a nominee but hadn’t told the person as of late Monday, that’s about 30 or so hours he or she will have to deal with the change. It’s just not possible from a practical perspective to expect someone to go to work at a State Capitol on Monday and basically disappear for 10 weeks—and maybe longer—fewer than 48 hours later.

  • Obama’s advisers said his decision came at the end of “what proved to be an unexpectedly intense process, condensed because he did not want to start actively vetting potential running mates before Clinton quit the race in June,” the Times says. But because of the shorter time period to find and vet someone, several Democrats observed that it appeared that only about six people were actually deeply vetted for VP, and the process was reportedly made easier by “the ability to turn up information on the Web.” (Remember when John McCain took so much heat for joking about his vice presidential selection, “Basically, it’s a Google”?"

    When the announcement—whatever it is—actually does come, advisers say, it will break in text and e-mail messages to supporters early in the morning. The Obama-BFF tour of swing states will kick off, maybe even immediately after the news is made public.

    As for the schedule, Obama is set to be in Orlando on Tuesday morning, in Raleigh, N.C., by Tuesday evening and in Virginia on Wednesday morning. But, the Times noted, “the Obama campaign has cautioned against reading anything into his schedule, saying it could be changed in an instant to accommodate the plan to introduce the running mate.”

    Suuuure it could. Because we know presidential candidates don’t require ANY advance work, right?

    Right.

    And so, we wait ... bored, as usual ... left to our scary political prognostications and our goofy odds-on lists where we try to handicap the latest VP buzz. (Smart money tonight is on Biden at 25 percent, then Bayh at 11, then Clinton at 10 percent, though 37 percent are banking on “a wildcard,” if anyone’s wondering.)

    One bonus: An early announcement by Obama today—or even a credible leak, even if it turns out to be wrong—would really help ... after all, it would mean Larry King would have to bump Bill Maher for a show on the pick.

    I support anything that means I will be spared hearing anything, even accidentally, from Bill Maher.

    So who’s it going to be? Let’s hear your best educated guesses and theories!




  • Page 80 of 171 pages « First  <  78 79 80 81 82 >  Last »

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles